Have Your Say: Ontario Securities Commission Consults on Introducing a “Comply or Explain” Model to Promote Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards

Gender diversity on corporate boards is a hot issue in Canada.  A recent report by TD Economics showed the extent of the disparity between Canada and other developed economies.  Women represent only 11% of board members for companies in the S&P/TSX Composite Index, with 43% of boards being all-male and 28% having just one female board member.  The report concluded that, in light of gender diversity initiatives in the European Union, Australia, and New Zealand, Canada is sliding down the international rankings.

The report suggested introducing a "comply or explain" policy, which would provide Corporate Canada with a "gentle push" to increase the numbers of women directors.  A "comply or explain" policy would suggest that gender diversity considerations should be embedded into corporate governance standards (“comply”) but allow companies the flexibility to deviate at their discretion, so long as they indicate to shareholders the reasons for deviation (“explain”).  The report rejected quotas on the basis that appointments should be made on merit. 

The Ontario Government included a statement supporting gender diversity in its May, 2013 budget.  The following month, the Government requested that the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) undertake a review and public consultation process considering a comply or explain disclosure requirement relating to board and senior management gender diversity for TSX listed companies.  The OSC has undertaken the consultation process by publishing a consultation paper which can be accessed here.

The consultation runs until September 27, 2013 and represents an opportunity to shape the policy before the OSC makes recommendations regarding disclosure requirements.  This is an earlier stage of the process for input than the customary “request for comments” process that the Commission adopts before publishing a new instrument.  That part of the process will still follow if the Commission determines to advance in that direction, but by that time the policy direction will have been set.

Share
  • John  Smith
    Senior Counsel

    John’s practice has covered substantial transactions and projects and increasingly focuses on ongoing advisory work to business clients ranging from large corporations to family businesses to fiduciaries. A significant ...

About Us

Lawson Lundell's Business Law Blog covers a wide range of topics relevant to businesses of all sorts, including corporate governance, corporate commercial law, corporate finance and securities, mergers and acquisitions, procurement, private equity and venture capital, intellectual property, and business taxation. Please also see our litigation, project law, China law, and real estate law blogs. 

Legal Disclaimer: The information made available on this webpage is for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and should not be relied on as such. Please contact our firm if you need legal advice or have questions about the content of this webpage. 

Editors

Authors

Topics

Recent Posts

Archives

Blogs

Jump to Page