B.C. Government Introduces Bill 12 – 2024 Public Health Accountability and Cost Recovery Act

In a joint statement with Meta, TikTok, Snap and X, on April 23, 2024, the BC government announced that it will put Bill 12 – 2024, Public Heath Accountability and Cost Recovery Act, on hold.  Instead, the government will strike the “BC Online Safety Action Table” in collaboration with Meta, Snap, TikTok and X, to discuss the tangible steps that can be taken to ensure safe, empowering experiences online.  Bill 12 had not been tabled for second reading since its introduction on March 14, 2024.


On March 14, 2024, the B.C. government introduced for first reading Bill 12 – 2024, Public Health Accountability and Cost Recovery Act. Under this proposed legislation, the government has a direct and sweeping right of action to sue a person to recover the cost of health care benefits “caused or contributed to by a health-related wrong.” The Bill is intended to permit the government to recover health care costs that are or may be incurred because of dangerous goods and services in the marketplace, whether or not an individual recipient of health care benefits makes a claim. This may include any good or service that the government can show poses a risk of disease, illness or injury, and that a defendant breached a duty or obligation to a person who might have been exposed to the good or service.

If passed, the Bill permits the government to sue for the present value of the “total expenditure by government for health care benefits” provided to, or that could be reasonably expected to be provided to benefit recipients as a result of the risk of or actual disease, injury or illness, including physical or mental injury or illness, problematic product use, addiction, and “general deterioration of health.” To prove the cause of action, the government need only prove, using population-based evidence and without identifying any individual benefit recipient:

  • that a defendant breached a duty or obligation to benefit recipients who used or have been exposed to, or might be exposed to, the product;
  • that using or being exposed to the product can cause or contribute to disease, injury or loss; and
  • the product was offered for distribution, sale or use in British Columbia.

If the government can prove these three things, the court will presume a defendant is liable for the costs, but can apportion liability based on market share. Otherwise, the burden shifts to a defendant to prove that any breach of duty did not contribute to the use of the good or service, or to the disease, injury or illness.

The legislation is patterned on the Opioid Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act, which has led to one of the largest and most complicated intended class actions in Canadian history. It will also apply retroactively – whenever the wrong occurred – and may apply even if a claim for damages based on a health care wrong has been adjudicated or settled in the past.

Share

About Us

This blog is authored by members of the Litigation and Dispute Resolution Department. We follow new and interesting issues emerging in the legal and business communities. The wide range of experience among the members of our litigation group will provide a diverse and insightful examination of current legal trends and topics. Our goal is to provide a source of valuable information and insight on a wide variety of matters for our readers.

Legal Disclaimer: The information made available on this webpage is for information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, and should not be relied on as such. Please contact our firm if you need legal advice or have questions about the content of this webpage. 

Authors

Topics

Recent Posts

Archives

Blogs

Jump to Page